Rivan

Well personally I still think it's total BS. Assuming it is 4 times more efficient, and there are 16trillion polygons worth of data and every polygon is only a single bit (which we all no is not gonna happen.) that's still 465.661287 GB. Now in order to render that all at once you need to store it in memory.I've got 3gigs ram and 1gig vram looks like I'm 461.661287 short. You can believe that this is going to be a major breakthrough coming to console systems in the near future, but it won't be for quite some time. Not to mention, as Notch stated, animations are going to be a nightmare.

Well either way, I like how it turned out, if you want it a little diffrent for your own use feel free to edit it as such. Just release under the same license.

That "outline" is actually a glow, and I saved it in jpeg for compression purposes, if you want a higher quality image PM me and I'll pass you one, i've also edited it a bit since then.

I just might do that, thanks

Just a wallpaper I made, enjoy. http://creativecommo...nses/by-sa/3.0/

Some people seem to think there is no such thing as a good game without graphics. This is the ignorance, and honestly just plain idocy, that makes me fear for the future of gaming. Let me take for example, notch. notch made a sandbox game with two features I adore. Simple down to earth graphics, and a creative nature. Minecraft didn't need fancy graphics, because the beauty of the game is in the simplicity. you can build whatever you want, live how you want and, my personal favorite, mod however you want. It's not a game about violence with enhanced bloody graphics, just a nice relaxing sandbox. I'd even go so far as to state that some of the best games I've played had -no- graphics, just text. In short, Don't bash or praise a game or it's creator based on graphical style. Because it's mechanics and inovation that make a game good, not particles of dust on the ground.

Yeah it has Nice to see you too Else

Most of you know me if you don't, congrats, save yourself the trouble of getting to know me. I've got some spare time and thought I'd hang out here a bit again as long as I was welcome.

If you haven't fixed it by Saturday, Mal, Toss it my way and I'll see if I can get it to work.

Happy B-day Naxylldritt

Yeah it's not really based on an actual time period. If you look at the general flow of Zelda games you can indeed find parallels to our world (age of exploration, Victorian england and the advent of steam as well as a feudal period of sorts) but none of these events happen in the time-frame manner or correct order. By the time steam rolled around there was no talk of sword and legendary mysteries still being taken seriously, it was more an era of science. Zelda seems to rather blend the medieval period with the steam period. so there's no way to know exactly when what occurred. As far as we know OoT could have occurred in the year 845 AD (the year the Danes raided the Franks FYI) or in the year 4000AD due to society progressing at a slower rate.

Bill Gates is Evil. My Hill

Good point any way Happy Birthday again Zeth.

So yeah just a happy birthday to the creator of this site, I do believe he's 25, so everyone out there show your love for Zeth <3

it was only a few days old D: You pedophile D: seriously Mal that's illegal *watches as you're arrested* My Hill